default avatar
Welcome to the site! Login or Signup below.
|
||
Logout|My Dashboard

Chamisa listed for auction

Print
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Tuesday, April 9, 2013 3:25 pm

Chamisa Hills Country Club is listed for sale by auction.

Rio Rancho’s country club and golf course is listed by NavPoint Real Estate Group LLC of Colorado as one of the properties in an online auction scheduled for May 29. The minimum bid is $850,000, or a little more than $3,600 per acre.

Country club member Kathy Colley said there’s been talk of selling Chamisa Hills for months.

“Hopefully, whoever buys it will keep it as a golf course,” she said.

However, Colley said local golfers could use nearby courses outside of Rio Rancho if that didn’t happen.

Chamisa Hills has tremendous historical value, being one of the first things developer AMREP built, Colley said. Top golfers and architects designed and built the course.

Owner Harry Apodaca and his partners bought the club more than a decade ago, and Colley said this is the fourth owner since she became a member in 1994.

City councilors Chuck Wilkins and Mark Scott said the club’s general manager, Ray Duran, told the Willow Trace Homeowners Association on March 26 that Apodaca, Duran’s father-in-law, was in for the long haul and planning improvements.

Charles “Chuck” Davis, who lives along the golf course and is a social member of Chamisa Hills, said the country club sold once before since his house was built, and homes continued to be bought and built in the neighborhood. Davis said retirees will still be looking for homes, which are desirable in the Chamisa Hills area.

“It’s sad that it’s going up for sale,” he said.

Davis wasn’t sure a country club would sell in the current economy. He said it will be interesting to see if it sells, who buys it and what they do with it.

If the country club closes, Davis said, Rio Rancho will lose jobs.

Wilkins and Scott said the city wouldn’t have the money to buy Chamisa Hills unless homeowners in the neighborhood agreed to pay a special tax. Scott, who lives near the country club, said the sale price is low, but the cost of maintenance and necessary renovations is prohibitive.

Wilkins said a city assessment using 2010 data indicated the club would need $3.42 million of improvements, plus $1.3 million a year in operating expenses, without the recent increase in water rates.

“To me, that would be another (Santa Ana) Star Center,” he said of the idea of the city buying the club.

Mayor Tom Swisstack said he is concerned about the situation. Even if someone buys Chamisa Hills, he asked, how will the city work with water rates and the buyer?

The city councilors recently voted to raise reused water rates to $4.54 per 1,000 gallons by 2017, up from the 47 cents per 1,000 gallons the country club pays now. At the time, club Office Manager Tsaja Duran said the increase would come close to putting Chamisa Hills out of business.

Under the higher reused water rates, Swisstack said, irrigating the golf course will cost about $1 million more after five years than before the increase. The city needs to look at the ramifications of fees on businesses, Swisstack said.

“This is the only organized open space we have in our city,” he said.

Swisstack said if the city took ownership, the golf course would be public and the Chamisa Hills restaurant might need to be privatized.

“I think we have a responsibility to look at all possible options, and so there should be some dialogue to discuss those options,” he said.

Swisstack also wants input from residents in the area.

Scott said, according to his rough estimate, if all of the approximately 1,000 homeowners living on the golf course paid for a membership, the country club would bring in $3.5 million a year. He’s concerned about property values along the golf course.

“This is critical,” Scott said.

Real estate agent Mark Fiedler said if the buyer of the country club doesn’t maintain the country club as a golf course, homes along the golf course could drop in value, depending on what development occurs there.

The uncertainty of the golf course’s fate could impact the ability for those homes to sell, he said.

However, Fiedler stressed there are too many unknown factors to really know the effect, if any.

“There’s a lot of what-ifs,” he said.

Fiedler said the whole city is better off having a golf course because it improves the local quality of life.

Chamisa Hills managers did not return phone calls seeking comment by press time.

  • Discuss

Welcome to the discussion.

8 comments:

  • PurpleSage posted at 2:34 pm on Wed, Apr 24, 2013.

    PurpleSage Posts: 1

    Kathie Allen•a few seconds ago


    "The city wouldn’t have the money to buy Chamisa Hills unless homeowners in the neighborhood agreed to pay a special tax." Huh??

    Don't look to the homeowners in the neighborhood to pay a special tax, especially for us who would never use it, and extra especially for us seniors who live on very limited incomes.

     
  • NoCorp posted at 11:26 am on Wed, Apr 24, 2013.

    NoCorp Posts: 202

    Wow, this is a great opportunty for Honky-Tonk Chuck Wilkins! Just think how many taco joints, nail salons, and credit unions can be built on the golf course site. No wait, a crappy fast food bagel joint would be perfect. Those people that are living near the golf course should quit whining. A strip mall will be there soon to lower their property values even more!

     
  • Q Citizen posted at 9:40 am on Thu, Apr 11, 2013.

    Q Citizen Posts: 560

    The Mayor was not concerned about the city budget, water rates, and maintenacne on the parks. He's only concerned about the park ABOVE. The only thing ABOVE, will be ABOVE what the city can afford. No one can tell us what the cost of maintenacne for the new park will be. GIVE US A COST!
    When this park was started it was being sold to everyone as not costing the taxpayers any money. The Fraud ABOVE PARK?.

     
  • sickandtired posted at 8:51 am on Thu, Apr 11, 2013.

    sickandtired Posts: 1

    I have never seen a city hate business as much as Rio Rancho. This city makes it almost impossible to do business here and let me remind all of you that without business taxable you have nothing ! As business owners we get fees for everything, and regulation after regulation after regulation. Here's an idea...if we have a water shortage problem then why don't we STOP BUILDING MORE HOUSES AND STRIP MALLS ? When I asked our clueless mayor that question he remarked " Dahhhh we don't have a water shortage" ! Lol !!! Talk about a one horse town!

     
  • Max's mom posted at 2:45 pm on Wed, Apr 10, 2013.

    Max's mom Posts: 2

    Population of 90,000 and we don't even have a public golf course. City of vision...what a joke.

     
  • Johnny Qwest posted at 1:46 pm on Wed, Apr 10, 2013.

    Johnny Qwest Posts: 50

    I can envision a park where families have room to roam, free of gang violence and doggy doo doo, and several statues of the Mayor and his former compadres to remind me of the constant waste being generated by this city!
    Wake up people this is 2013 and we need your money to fix our streets and water leaks, hire more Police officers, and all within the budget our local city must meet. Politicians who promise you one thing and do another need not apply in this city! We need men and women of moral conviction, those willing to do the things that sometimes are not the most popular thing to do but, the right and moral thing to do.
    Chamisa Hills C.C. has been a constant Venus Fly Trap to investors eager to make a profit but never returning a place the community can be proud of. Water is not free and yes it can run out if we are not cautious. CHCC is no exeption and yes they need to pay their fair share for the right to use recycled water.
    If I have to pay 8% more for mine this year then they must pay more for their's.
    That is why I have reduced my grassed area at my home by 33% this spring, it will now by rock. It's not popular, but it's the right hing to do.
    Get a grip on spending and making hard moral decisions, we do not want D.C. politics here!

     
  • gargoylefun posted at 9:58 pm on Tue, Apr 9, 2013.

    gargoylefun Posts: 8

    The city can not afford another Star center situation. I would not support the city taking ownership.

     
  • Q Citizen posted at 9:56 pm on Tue, Apr 9, 2013.

    Q Citizen Posts: 560

    Maybe someone who has some money to put in to the place will buy it. I don't see it being an asset to the city in its current conditon. The Mayor can't even buy a police car for the city and now wants to buy another park/golf course. Hope, he doesn't get another wild idea to run up to Santa Fe with one of his home made forms.

     

Partner Sites

Journal

Chieftain

News-Bulletin

Telegraph

Nucleus